What Claude Opus 5.5 costs here
AIReiter bills 50% of Anthropic list on every line. Same model, same Messages protocol, half the invoice.
A real call: $3.00 instead of $6.00
One million input tokens plus one hundred thousand output tokens costs $3.00 on AIReiter. The same call billed at Anthropic list is $6.00. Nothing about the request changes — only the endpoint and the key.
Every line, halved
Input $4.00 list becomes $2.00. Output $20.00 becomes $10.00. Cache reads $0.20 becomes $0.10. Cache writes $5.00 becomes $2.50. All per million tokens.
You pay for tokens you actually used
AIReiter holds an estimate before the call, then settles against the real token count when the response completes and returns the difference. A short answer to a long prompt does not cost you the estimate.
No cliff at 200K
The rate is identical from the first token to the millionth. There is no long-context tier to design around and no reason to chunk a long document just to stay under a threshold.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
Both launched the same week and both run here under one key, so this compares live AIReiter prices rather than list pages. The short version: Sol is cheaper, Opus 5.5 is steadier and stronger on agentic work.
GPT-6 Sol is cheaper per token
Sol runs $0.60 in and $3.00 out per million tokens here, against $2.00 and $10.00 for Opus 5.5. That holds at every prompt length, including inside Sol's long-context tier. If per-token cost is the only thing that matters, Sol wins.
Sol has a price cliff; Opus 5.5 does not
Above 272K context Sol's input price doubles and its output price rises by half. A workload that drifts across that line sees its bill step up overnight. Opus 5.5 charges one rate to 1M, so your cost curve stays a straight line.
Agentic and coding work favours Opus 5.5
Anthropic reports that Opus 5.5 beats Claude Fable 5.1 on key agentic benchmarks while listing far below it. That is vendor-reported, not measured here — run it against the loop you actually ship before you decide.
One key, both models
Sol and Opus 5.5 are in the same playground on the same account. Send one real task through each and compare cost per finished task rather than cost per request.
How to call the Claude Opus 5.5 API
The route speaks the Anthropic Messages protocol. An existing Claude client needs two lines changed.
Repoint the client
Set the base URL to https://aireiter.com/api/v1 and swap in your AIReiter key. The official Anthropic SDKs work unchanged once the base URL is set.
Send the request
POST https://aireiter.com/api/v1/messages { "model": "claude-opus-5-5", "max_tokens": 4096, "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}] }
Tune effort, not thinking
Adaptive thinking is on by default. To spend fewer tokens set output_config.effort to low or medium rather than disabling thinking — with thinking off, the Opus 5 family sometimes writes a tool call into visible text instead of emitting a tool_use block.
Claude Opus 5.5 API FAQ
/ 01Do I need an Anthropic account?
No. Use an AIReiter key against the AIReiter endpoint. If you have not integrated anything yet, test the model in the playground on this page first.
/ 02What does it cost against going direct?
Half. Anthropic lists $4 input and $20 output per million tokens; AIReiter charges $2 and $10. Cache reads are $0.10 against $0.20 list.
/ 03Which protocols can I use?
Anthropic Messages at /api/v1/messages is the primary contract. OpenAI-style Chat Completions and the Responses API are also served, and /api/v1/models lists what is available to your key.
/ 04Does streaming work?
Yes. The Messages route supports both streamed and non-streamed responses with the same request shape you would send to Anthropic.
/ 05How am I charged if a response is cut short?
An estimate is held when the call starts, then reconciled against actual input and output tokens when it finishes, and the unused portion is returned. You are billed on real usage, not on the hold.
/ 06Should I pick Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Sol?
Sol costs less per token at every length. Choose Opus 5.5 when you want a flat rate with no long-context cliff, or when agentic and coding quality decides it. Both are on one key, so test rather than guess.